Skip to main content

Dickens’s Idiomatic Imagination: Bibliography

Dickens’s Idiomatic Imagination
Bibliography

  • Show the following:

    Annotations
    Resources

  • Adjust appearance:

    Font
    Font style
    Color Scheme
    Light
    Dark
    Annotation contrast
    Low
    High
    Margins
  • Search within:
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeDickens's Idiomatic Imagination
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

table of contents
  1. Acknowledgments
  2. Introduction
  3. 1. The Beginnings of Dickens’s Idiomatic Imagination
  4. 2. “Shouldering the Wheel” in Bleak House
  5. 3. “Brought Up by Hand”
  6. 4. Sweat Work and Nose Grinding in Our Mutual Friend
  7. Conclusion
  8. Appendix A
  9. Appendix B
  10. Appendix C
  11. Bibliography
  12. Index

BIBLIOGRAPHY

  • Aarsleff, Hans. 1967. The Study of Language in England, 1780–1860. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Aarsleff, Hans. 1981. From Locke to Saussure. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Abberly, Will. 2015. English Fiction and the Evolution of Language, 1850–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Adams, James Eli. 1995. Dandies and Desert Saints. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Adams, James Eli. 2005. “ ‘The Boundaries of Social Intercourse’: Class and the Victorian Novel.” In A Concise Companion to the Victorian Novel, edited by Francis O’Gorman, 47–70. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.
  • Adams, James Eli. 2012. A History of Victorian Literature. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Addison, Joseph. 1712. The Spectator, No. 285 (January 26). In The Spectator (1965), edited by Donald F. Bond. Volume III. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 9–15.
  • Aesop. 1926. The Fables of Aesop. Edited by Joseph Jacobs. London: Macmillan.
  • Agamben, Giorgio. 1999. Potentialities. Edited and translated by Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Ahl, Fredrick. 1985. “Ars Est Artem (Art in Puns and Anagrams Engraved).” In On Puns: The Foundation of Letters, edited by Jonathan Culler, 17–43. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Allard, James. 2007. Romanticism, Medicine, and the Poet’s Body. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Allison, Sarah. 2018. Reductive Reading: A Syntax of Victorian Reading. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Alter, Robert. 1996. “Reading Style in Dickens.” Philosophy and Literature 20 (1): 130–37.
  • Altick, Richard D. 1980. “Bleak House: The Reach of Chapter One.” Dickens Studies Annual 8:73–104.
  • Altieri, Charles. 2015. Reckoning with the Imagination. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Andrews, Malcolm. 2006. Charles Dickens and His Performing Selves. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Andrews, Malcolm. 2013. Dickensian Laughter: Essays on Dickens and Humour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Aristotle. 1986. De Anima. Edited by Hugh Lawson-Tancred. New York: Penguin.
  • Armstrong, Nancy. 1987. Desire and Domestic Fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Armstrong, Nancy. 2005. How Novels Think. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Armstrong, Nancy, and Warren Montag. 2017. “The Figure in the Carpet.” PMLA 132, no. 3 (May): 613–19.
  • Attridge, Derek. 1988. Peculiar Language: Literature as Difference from the Renaissance to James Joyce. London: Methuen.
  • Attridge, Derek. 1989. “Language as History/History as Language: Saussure and the Romance of Etymology.” In Post-structuralism and the Question of History, edited by Derek Attridge, Geoff Bennington, and Robert Young, 183–211. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Attridge, Derek. 2000. Joyce Effects: On Language, Theory, and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Auerbach, Nina. 1982. The Woman and the Demon: The Life of a Victorian Myth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Austin, J. L. 1979. Philosophical Papers. Edited by J. O. Urmson and G. J. Warnok. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ayto, John, ed. 2009. Oxford Dictionary of English Idioms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1968. Rabelais and His World. Translated by Helene Iswolsky. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Barringer, Tim. 2005. Men at Work: Art and Labour in Victorian Britain. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Barthes, Roland. 1982. “The Plates of the Encyclopedia.” In A Barthes Reader, edited by Susan Sontag, 218–34. New York: Hill & Wang.
  • Barthes, Roland. 1988. “The Death of the Author.” In Image Text Music, translated by Stephen Heath, 142–48. New York: Noonday Press.
  • Beamish, Richard. 1843. Psychonomy of the Hand. London: Pitman.
  • Beer, Gillian. 1983. Darwin’s Plots. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Beer, Gillian. 1996. Open Fields: Science in Cultural Encounter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Beeton, Isabella. 1861. Book of Household Management. London: S. O. Beeton.
  • Beirderwell, Bruce. 1985. “The Coherence of Our Mutual Friend.” Journal of Narrative Theory 15 (3): 234–43.
  • Bell, Charles. 1833. The Hand: Its Mechanism and Endowments as Evincing Design. London: Pickering and Chatto.
  • Benston, Alice. 2002. “The Smallweeds and Trooper George: The Autochthony Theme in Bleak House.” Mosaic 21 (4): 99–110.
  • “The Bentinck Bubble.” 1847. The Examiner, February 13, 1847.
  • Bernstein, Susan David. 2001. “Ape Anxiety: Sensation Fiction, Evolution, and the Genre Question.” Journal of Victorian Culture 6, no. 2 (Autumn): 250–71.
  • Best, Stephen, and Sharon Marcus. 2009. “Surface Reading: An Introduction.” Representations 108, no. 1 (Fall): 1–21.
  • The Bible: Authorized King James Version with Apocrypha. 1997. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Black, Max. 1962. Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Bode, Katherine. 2018. A World of Fiction: Digital Collections and the Future of Literary Study. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Bodenheimer, Rosemarie. 1991. The Politics of Story in Victorian Social Fiction. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Bodenheimer, Rosemarie. 1994. The Real Life of Mary Ann Evans. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Bodenheimer, Rosemarie. 2002. “Dickens and the Identical Man: Our Mutual Friend Doubled.” Dickens Studies Annual 31:159–74.
  • Bodenheimer, Rosemarie. 2007. Knowing Dickens. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Boileau, Nicolas. 2014. “Trauma and ‘Ordinary Words’: Virginia Woolf’s Play on Words.” In The Edges of Trauma, edited by Tomás Bényei and Alexandra Stara, 48–60. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars.
  • Boll, Ernest. 1944. “The Plotting of Our Mutual Friend.” Modern Philology 42 (2): 96–122.
  • Booth, Alison. 2017. “Mid-range Reading: Not a Manifesto.” PMLA 132, no. 3 (May): 620–27.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction. Translated by Richard Nice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Translated by Richard Nice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Edited by John B. Thompson. Translated by Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Bourrier, Karen. 2015. The Measure of Manliness: Disability and Masculinity in the Mid-Victorian Novel. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Bowen, John. 2000. Other Dickens: Pickwick to Chuzzlewit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bowen, John. 2013. “Dickens’s Umbrellas.” In Dickens’s Style, edited by Daniel Tyler, 26–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bowen, John, and Robert Patten. 2006. Palgrave Advances in Charles Dickens Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Bowles, Hugo. 2019. Dickens and the Stenographic Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bradbury, Nicola. 2003. Introduction to Bleak House, xix–xxxv. New York: Penguin.
  • Bradbury, Nicola. 2005. “Working and Being Worked in Our Mutual Friend.” Australasian Victorian Studies Journal 1 (1): 1–7.
  • Bradshaw, David, and Suzanne Ozment, eds. 2000. The Voice of Toil: Nineteenth-Century Writings about Work. Athens: Ohio University Press.
  • Brantlinger, Patrick. 1996. Fictions of State: Culture and Credit in Britain, 1694–1994. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Brantlinger, Patrick. 2011. Taming Cannibals: Race and the Victorians. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Brattin, Joel. 1985. “Dickens’ Creation of Bradley Headstone.” Dickens Studies Annual 14:147–65.
  • Breton, Rob. 2005. Gospels and Grit: Work and Labor in Carlyle, Conrad, and Orwell. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Briefel, Aviva. 2015. The Racial Hand in the Victorian Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • British Library Newspapers. 2008. Gale. https://www.gale.com/c/british-library-newspapers.
  • British Periodicals. 2007. ProQuest. https://proquest.com/en/products-services/british_periodicals.
  • Bromwich, David. 2019. How Words Make Things Happen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Brontë, Charlotte. 2019. Jane Eyre. Oxford:: Oxford World’s Classics.
  • Brooks, G. L. 1970. The Language of Dickens. London: Deutsch.
  • Brooks, Peter. 1984. Reading for the Plot. New York: Knopf.
  • Brooks, Peter. 1993. Body Work: Objects of Desire in Modern Narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Brooks, Peter. 2005. Realist Vision. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Brorby, Joshua. 2020. “Our Mutable Inheritance: Testing Victorian Philology in Our Mutual Friend.” Dickens Quarterly 37, no. 1 (March): 47–66.
  • Brown, Carolyn. 1987. “Great Expectations: Masculinity and Modernity.” In Broadening the Cultural Context, edited by Michael Green, 60–74. London: Murray.
  • Buckland, Adelene. 2021. “Charles Dickens, Man of Science.” Victorian Literature and Culture 49 (3): 423–455.
  • Burke, Peter, and Roy Porter, eds. 1987. The Social History of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Burney, Frances. (1788) 2002. Evelina. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. New York: Routledge.
  • Butt, John, and Kathleen Tillotson. 1957. Dickens at Work. London: Methuen.
  • Buzard, James. 2005. Disorienting Fiction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Bythell, Duncan. 1978. The Sweated Trades: Outwork in Nineteenth-Century Britain. New York: St. Martin’s.
  • Callow, Simon. 2012. Dickens and the Great Theatre of the World. New York: Vintage.
  • Capuano, Peter J. 2015. Changing Hands: Industry, Evolution, and the Reconfiguration of the Victorian Body. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Carey, John. 1973. The Violent Effigy: A Study of Dickens’ Imagination. London: Faber & Faber.
  • Carlyle, Thomas. 1842. Chartism. London: Chapman & Hall.
  • Carlyle, Thomas. 1919. Past and Present. London: Dent.
  • Carlyle, Thomas. 1974. Sartor Resartus, Heroes, and Past and Present. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Casey, Edward S. 1976. Imagining: A Phenomenological Study. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Cavell, Stanley. 1969. Must We Mean What We Say? New York: Scribner’s.
  • Cavell, Stanley. 1979. The Claim of Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cavell, Stanley. 2005. Philosophy the Day after Tomorrow. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Chambers, Robert. (1844) 1994. Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation and Other Evolutionary Writings. Edited by James A. Secord. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Chapple, J. A. V. 1986. Science and Literature in the Nineteenth Century. London: Macmillan.
  • Chase, Karen. 1984. Eros and Psyche: The Representation of Personality in Charlotte Brontë, Charles Dickens, and George Eliot. London: Methuen.
  • Chase, Karen, and Michael Levenson. 2017. “Bleak House, Liquid City: Climate to Climax in Dickens.” In A Global History of Literature and the Environment, edited by John Parham and Louise Westling, 201–17. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cheadle, Brian. 2001a. “The Late Novels: Great Expectations and Our Mutual Friend.” In The Cambridge Companion to Charles Dickens, edited by John O. Jordan, 78–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cheadle, Brian. 2001b. “Work in Our Mutual Friend.” Essays in Criticism 51 (3): 308–29.
  • Chenier, Natasha Rose. 2014. “ ‘And Words. They Are Not in My Dictionary’: A Lexicographical Study of James Joyce and the Oxford English Dictionary.” James Joyce Quarterly 51, no. 2–3 (Winter–Spring): 419–36.
  • Chesterton, G. K. 1911. Appreciations and Criticisms of the Works of Charles Dickens. London: Dent.
  • Chittick, Kathryn. 1990. Dickens and the 1830s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Christie, John, and Sally Shuttleworth, eds. 1989. Nature Transfigured: Science and Literature: 1700–1900. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
  • Clayton, Jay. 2003. Charles Dickens in Cyberspace: The Afterlife of the Nineteenth Century in Postmodern Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cockshut, A. O. J. 1962. The Imagination of Charles Dickens. New York: New York University Press.
  • Cohen, Jane R. 1980. Charles Dickens and His Original Illustrators. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
  • Cohen, William A. 1993. “Manual Conduct in Great Expectations.” ELH 60 (1): 217–59.
  • Cohen, William A. 1996. Sex Scandal. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Cohen, William A. 2009. Embodied: Victorian Literature and the Senses. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Coleman, Rosemary. 2014. “How Dombey and Son Thinks about Masculinities.” Dickens Studies Annual 45:125–45.
  • Collins, Philip. 1963. Dickens and Education. London: Macmillan.
  • Collins, Philip, ed. 1971. Dickens: The Critical Heritage. New York: Barnes & Noble.
  • Connor, Steven. 1985. Charles Dickens. London: Basil Blackwell.
  • Connor, Steven. 2000. “Consequential Ground: The Foot Passengers of Bleak House.” Lecture at the Birkbeck College Dickens Day, September 30, 2000. http://stevenconnor.com/foot.
  • Corbett, Mary Jean. 2020. Behind the Times: Virginia Woolf in Late Victorian Contexts. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Cowie, A. P., and R. Mackin, eds. 1975. Oxford Dictionary of Current Idiomatic English. Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cowie, A. P., R. Mackin, and I. R. McCaig, eds. 1983. Oxford Dictionary of Current Idiomatic English. Volume 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cox, G. W. 1862. “Max Müller on the Science of Language.” Edinburgh Review 115 (January): 67–103.
  • Culler, Jonathan. 1985. “The Call of the Phoneme: Introduction.” In On Puns: The Foundation of Letters, 1–16. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Culler, Jonathan. 2010. “The Closeness of Close Reading.” ADE Bulletin 149 (1): 20–25.
  • Curtis, L. Perry. 1979. Apes and Angels: The Irishman in Victorian Caricature. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
  • Da, Nan Z. 2019. “The Computational Case against Computational Literary Studies.” Critical Inquiry 25, no. 2 (Spring): 601–39.
  • Daleski, H. M. 1970. Dickens and the Art of Analogy. New York: Schocken.
  • Dalgano, Emily. 2012. Virginia Woolf and the Migrations of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dames, Nicholas. 2007. The Physiology of the Novel: Reading, Neural Science, and the Form of Victorian Fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Danahay, Martin. 2005. Gender at Work in Victorian Culture. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Danahay, Martin. 2011. “Work.” In Charles Dickens in Context, edited by Sally Ledger and Holly Furneaux, 194–202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Darwin, Charles. 1996. On the Origin of Species. Edited by Gillian Beer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • David, Deirdre. 1981. Fictions of Resolution in Three Victorian Novels. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • David, Deirdre. 2002. “Empire, Race, and the Victorian Novel.” In A Companion to the Victorian Novel, edited by Patrick Brantlinger and William B. Thesing, 84–100. London: Blackwell.
  • David, Deirdre. 2011. “Review of Supposing Bleak House.” Review 19, September 17, 2011. http://www.review19.org.
  • Davidoff, Leonore. 1979. “Class and Gender in Victorian England: The Diaries of Arthur J. Munby and Hannah Culliwick.” Feminist Studies 5 (1): 86–141.
  • Davis, Lennard. 1995. Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness, and the Body. New York: Verso.
  • Davis, Lennard. 2012. “Seeing the Object as in Itself It Really Is: Beyond the Metaphor of Disability.” In The Madwoman and the Blindman: Jane Eyre, Discourse, Disability, edited by David Bolt, Julia Miele Rodas, and Elizabeth J. Donaldson, ix–xii. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
  • Davis, Lennard. 2013. “The End of Identity Politics: On Disability as an Unstable Category.” In The Disabilities Reader, edited by Lennard Davis, 263–67. New York: Routledge.
  • Davison, Sarah. 2014. “Trenchant Criticism: Joyce’s Use of Richard Chenevix Trench’s Philological Studies in ‘Oxen of the Sun.’ ” Joyce Studies Annual 24 (1): 164–95.
  • de Certeau, Michel. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Translated by Steven Randall. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • de Man, Paul. 1983. Blindness and Insight. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Deering, Dorothy. 1977. “Dickens’s Armory for the Mind: The English Language Studies in Household Words and All the Year Round.” Dickens Studies Newsletter 8:11–17.
  • Defoe, Daniel. (1719) 2008. Robinson Crusoe. Edited by Thomas Keymer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Derenzy, George Webb. 1822. Enchiridion: Or A Hand for the One-Handed. London: Underwood.
  • Derrida, Jacques. 2005a. On Touching—Jean-Luc Nancy. Translated by Christine Irizarry. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Derrida, Jacques. 2005b. Paper Machine. Translated by Rachel Bowlby. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Derrida, Jacques. 2007. “Heidegger’s Hand (Geschlecht II).” Translated by John P. Leavey Jr. In Psyche: Inventions of the Other, edited by Peggy Kamuf and Elizabeth Rottenberg. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Detloff, Madelyn. 2016. The Value of Virginia Woolf. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • DiBattista, Maria. 2000. “Virginia Woolf and the Language of Authorship.” In The Cambridge Companion to Virginia Woolf, edited by Sue Roe and Susan Sellers, 127–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dickens, Charles. (1836) 1995. Sketches by Boz. New York: Penguin.
  • Dickens, Charles. (1836–37) 2003. The Pickwick Papers. New York: Penguin.
  • Dickens, Charles. 1837. “The Pantomime of Life.” Bentley’s Miscellany 1, no. 1 (January): 291–97.
  • Dickens, Charles. (1837–39) 2003. Oliver Twist. New York: Penguin.
  • Dickens, Charles. (1840–41) 2000. The Old Curiosity Shop. New York: Penguin.
  • Dickens, Charles. (1841) 1973. Barnaby Rudge. New York: Penguin.
  • Dickens, Charles. (1843) 1971. A Christmas Carol/The Chimes. New York: Penguin.
  • Dickens, Charles. 1848. “The Poetry of Science, or Studies of the Physical Phenomena of Nature.” The Examiner, no. 2132: 787–88. London: George Lapham.
  • Dickens, Charles. (1848) 2002. Dombey and Son. New York: Penguin.
  • Dickens, Charles. (1849–50) 2004. David Copperfield. New York: Penguin.
  • Dickens, Charles. 1850. “Supposing!” Household Words 1, no. 4: 96.
  • Dickens, Charles. (1852–53) 2003. Bleak House. New York: Penguin.
  • Dickens, Charles. 1853. “The Noble Savage.” Household Words 7 (168): 337–39.
  • Dickens, Charles. (1854) 2003. Hard Times. New York: Penguin.
  • Dickens, Charles. (1855–57) 2003. Little Dorrit. New York: Penguin.
  • Dickens, Charles. (1859) 1988. A Tale of Two Cities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dickens, Charles. (1860–61) 2003. Great Expectations. New York: Penguin.
  • Dickens, Charles. (1864–65) 1997. Our Mutual Friend. New York: Penguin.
  • Dickens, Charles. (1865) 1997. “Postscript, In Lieu of Preface.” In Our Mutual Friend, 798–800. New York: Penguin.
  • Dickens, Charles. 1999. Great Expectations. Edited by Edgar Rosenberg. New York: Norton.
  • Dickens, Charles. 2003. The Mystery of Edwin Drood. New York: Penguin.
  • Dickens, Charles. 2006. A Christmas Carol and Other Christmas Books. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dickens, Mamie. 1896. My Father as I Recall Him. London: Roxburghe.
  • Dixon, Edmund Saul. 1853. “The Mind of Brutes.” Household Words 7 (177): 564–69.
  • Douglas-Fairhurst, Robert. 2006. Introduction to A Christmas Carol and Other Christmas Books, vii–xxix. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Douglas-Fairhurst, Robert. 2011. Becoming Dickens: The Invention of a Novelist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Douglas-Fairhurst, Robert. 2013. “Dickens’s Rhythms.” In Dickens’s Style, edited by Daniel Tyler, 73–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Douglas-Fairhurst, Robert. 2022. The Turning Point: 1851—A Year that Changed Charles Dickens and the World. New York: Knopf.
  • Dowling, Linda. 1982. “Victorian Oxford and the Science of Language.” PMLA 97 (2): 160–78.
  • Dowling, Linda. 1986. Language and Decadence in the Victorian Fin de Siècle. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Downing, Gregory M. 1998. “Richard Chenevix Trench and Joyce’s Historical Study of Words.” Joyce Studies Annual 9 (1): 937–68.
  • Dramatic Dickens. 1989. Edited by Carol Hanberry MacKay. London: Macmillan.
  • Drucker, Johanna. 2017. “Why Distant Reading Isn’t.” PMLA 132, no. 3 (May): 628–35.
  • Du Chaillu, Paul. 1861. Explorations and Adventures in Equatorial Africa. London: John Murray.
  • Dyson, A. E. 1970. The Inimitable Dickens. London: Macmillan.
  • Eagleton, Terry. 1995. Heathcliff and the Great Hunger. New York: Verso.
  • Eagleton, Terry. 2003. Preface to Bleak House, vii–xii. Edited by Nicola Bradbury. New York: Penguin.
  • Eagleton, Terry. 2005. The English Novel. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Eigner, Edward. 1989. The Dickens Pantomime. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Elfenbein, Andrew. 1995. “Managing the House in Dombey and Son: Dickens and the Uses of Analogy.” Studies in Philology 92 (3): 361–82.
  • Elfenbein, Andrew. 2018. The Gist of Reading. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Eliot, T. S. 1927. “Wilkie Collins and Dickens.” Times Literary Supplement, August 4, 1927, 525–26.
  • Emre, Merve. 2022. “Getting to Yes: The Making of Ulysses.” The New Yorker. February 14 and 21, 68–73.
  • Emre, Merve. 2023. “The Return to Philology.” PMLA 138 (1): 171–177.
  • Engels, Friedrich. (1845) 1993. The Condition of the Working Class in England. Edited by David McLellan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Engels, Friedrich. (1876) 1968. “The Part Played by Labour in the Transition from Ape to Man.” In Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, Selected Works, 358–73. New York: Progress.
  • Eve, Martin Paul. 2019. Close Reading with Computers. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Evernden, Tamsin. 2018. “Crooked Antics: The Visions of Jenny Wren in Dickens’s Our Mutual Friend.” Working Papers in the Humanities 12 (1): 11–19.
  • Fahnstock, Jeanne. 2011. Rhetorical Style: The Uses of Language in Persuasion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Felski, Rita. 2000. Doing Time: Feminist Theory and Postmodern Culture. New York: New York University Press.
  • Felski, Rita. 2009. “After Suspicion.” Profession 33 (1): 28–35.
  • Felski, Rita. 2011. “Context Stinks.” New Literary History 42 (4): 573–91.
  • Felski, Rita. 2015. The Limits of Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ferguson, Frances. 2013. “Philology, Literature, Style.” ELH 80 (2): 323–41.
  • Fernando, Chitra, and Roger Flavell. 1981. On Idiom. Exeter, UK: University of Exeter Press.
  • Fielding, K. J. 1958. Charles Dickens: A Critical Introduction. London: Longman’s and Green.
  • Fielding, K. J., ed. 1960. The Speeches of Charles Dickens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Fielding, K. J. 1961. “The Critical Autonomy of Great Expectations.” Review of English Literature 2 (1): 75–88.
  • Fisher, Benjamin. 1999. “Poe in Great Britain.” In Poe Abroad: Influence, Reputation, Affinities, edited by Lois Davis Vines, 52–61. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
  • Flanders, Julia. 2013. “The Literary, the Humanistic, the Digital: Toward a Research Agenda for Literary Studies.” In Literary Studies in the Digital Age, edited by Ken Price and Ray Siemens. New York: Modern Language Association.
  • Flint, Kate. 1986. Dickens. London: Harvester.
  • Flint, Kate. 2001. “The Middle Novels: Chuzzlewit, Dombey, and Copperfield.” In The Cambridge Companion to Charles Dickens, edited by John O. Jordan, 34–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Flint, Kate. 2018. “Bleak House.” In The Oxford Handbook of Charles Dickens, edited by Robert L. Patten, John O. Jordan, and Catherine Waters, 220–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ford, George H. 1955. Dickens and His Readers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Ford, George H. 1958. “Self-Help and the Helpless.” In From Jane Austen to Joseph Conrad, edited by Robert C. Rathburn and Martin Stienmann Jr., 92–105. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Ford, George H., and Lauriat Lane Jr., eds. 1961. The Dickens Critics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Forker, Charles. 1961–62. “The Language of Hands in Great Expectations.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language 3 (1): 280–93.
  • Forster, John. 1892. The Life of Charles Dickens. 3 Vols. London: Chapman & Hall.
  • Foucault, Michel. 1973. The Order of Things. New York: Vintage.
  • Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage.
  • Foucault, Michel. 1979. “What Is an Author?” In Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-structuralist Criticism, edited by Josué V. Havari, 141–60. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Free, Melissa. 2008. “Freaks That Matter: The Doll’s Dressmaker, the Doctor’s Assistant, and the Limits of Difference.” In Victorian Freaks, edited by Marlene Tromp, 259–82. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
  • Furneaux, Holly. 2009. Queer Dickens: Erotics, Families, Masculinities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gager, Valerie L. 1996. Shakespeare and Dickens: The Dynamics of Influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gailey, Amanda. 2016. “Some Problems with Big Data.” American Periodicals 26 (1): 22–24.
  • Gallagher, Catherine. 2008. The Body Economic. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Gallop, Jane. 1988. Thinking through the Body. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Gane, Gillian. 1996. “The Hat, the Hook, the Eyes, the Teeth: Captain Cuttle and Mr. Carker.” Dickens Studies Annual 25:91–126.
  • Garis, Robert. 1965. The Dickens Theatre. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. 1997. Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Literature and Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. 2002. “The Politics of Staring: Visual Rhetorics of Disability in Popular Photography.” In Disability Studies: Enabling the Humanities, edited by Sharon L. Snyder, Brenda Jo Brueggeman, and Rosemarie Garland-Thomson, 56–75. New York: Modern Language Association.
  • Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. 2009. Staring: How We Look. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Genette, Gérard. 1997. Paratexts. Translated by Jane E. Lewin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gerschick, Thomas, and Adam Stephen Miller. 1995. “Coming to Terms: Masculinity and Physical Disability.” In Men’s Lives, edited by Michael S. Kimmel and Michael A. Messner, 262–75. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Gibbons, Luke. 2013. “ ‘He Says No, Your Worship’: Joyce, Free Indirect Discourse and Vernacular Modernism.” In James Joyce in the Nineteenth Century, edited by John Nash, 31–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gibson, Anna. 2015. “Our Mutual Friend and Network Form.” Novel: A Forum on Fiction 48 (1): 63–84.
  • Gibson, Anna, Adam Grener, and Frankie Goodenough. 2022a. “General Introduction: Dickens and Serial Form.” Anna Gibson and Adam Grener, Directors. Digital Dickens Notes Project. http://dickensnotes.com/introduction/general.
  • Gibson, Anna, Adam Grener, and Frankie Goodenough. 2022b. “Scholarly Introduction: Rethinking Dickens’s Serial Form with the Digital Dickens Notes Project.” Anna Gibson and Adam Grener, Directors. Digital Dickens Notes Project. http://dickensnotes.com/introduction/scholarly.
  • Gilbert, Pamela K. 2019. Victorian Skin: Surface, Self, History. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Gillooly, Eileen, and Deirdre David, eds. 2009. Contemporary Dickens. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
  • Gitleman, Lisa. 2013.“Raw Data” Is an Oxymoron. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gitter, Elisabeth. 2004. “Dickens’s Dombey and Son and the Anatomy of Coldness.” Dickens Studies Annual 34:99–116.
  • Glass, Montague. 1911. Abe and Mawruss. New York: Doubleday.
  • Goffman, Erving. 1963. Behavior in Public Places. New York: Free Press.
  • Goldberg, Michael. 1972. Carlyle and Dickens. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
  • Golding, Robert. 1985. Idiolects in Dickens. London: Macmillan.
  • Goodlad, Lauren M. E. 2003. “Is There a Pastor in the House? Sanitary Reform, Professionalism, and Philanthropy in Dickens’s Mid-century Fiction.” Victorian Literature and Culture 31 (2): 525–53.
  • Goodrich, Peter. 2017. “Proboscations: Excavations in Comedy and Law.” Critical Inquiry 43 (1): 361–88.
  • Gore, Clare Walker. 2021. Plotting Disability in the Nineteenth-Century Novel. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Görlach, Manfred. 1999. English in Nineteenth-Century England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Grass, Sean. 2014. Charles Dickens’s Our Mutual Friend: A Publishing History. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Greenberg, Kenneth S. 1990. “The Nose, the Lie, and the Duel in the Antebellum South.” American Historical Review 95 (1): 57–74.
  • Grève, Sebastian, and Jakub Mácha, eds. 2016. Wittgenstein and the Creativity of Language. London: Palgrave.
  • Gribble, Jennifer. 1975. “Depth and Surface in Our Mutual Friend.” Essays in Criticism 25 (2): 197–214.
  • Gribble, Jennifer. 2013. “Compound Interest: Dickens’s Figurative Style.” In Dickens’s Style, edited by Daniel Tyler, 195–213. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Groebner, Valentin. 2009. Defaced: The Visual Culture of Violence in the Late Middle Ages. New York: Zone.
  • Hack, Danny. 1999. “ ‘Sublimation Strange’: Allegory and Authority in Bleak House.” ELH 66 (1): 129–56.
  • Hack, Danny. 2005. The Material Concerns of the Victorian Novel. Charlotteville: University of Virginia Press.
  • Hack, Danny. 2016. Reaping Something New. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Hager, Kelly. 2010. Dickens and the Rise of Divorce. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Hansard Parliamentary Debates Archive. Nineteenth-Century Collections Online (NCCO). Gale-Cengage.
  • Hardy, Barbara. 1970. The Moral Art of Dickens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hardy, Barbara. 2008. Dickens and Creativity. New York: Continuum.
  • Harpham, Geoffrey. 2009. “Roots, Races, and the Return to Philology.” Representations 106 (1): 34–62.
  • Hartley, Jenny. 2016. Charles Dickens: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hawes, Donald. 1972. “Marryat and Dickens: A Personal and Literary Relationship.” Dickens Studies Annual 2:39–68.
  • Hayles, N. Katherine. 2010. “How We Read: Close, Hyper, Machine.” ADE Bulletin 150 (1): 62–79.
  • Hazlitt, William. 1810. A New and Improved Grammar of the English Tongue. London: M. J. Godwin.
  • Hazlitt, William. 1905. Table-Talk: Essays on Men and Manners. London: Henry Frowde.
  • Hecimovich, Gregg A. 1995. “The Cup and the Lip and the Riddle of Our Mutual Friend.” ELH 62 (4): 955–77.
  • Heidegger, Martin. 1968. What Is Called Thinking? Translated by Fred D. Wieck and J. Glenn Gray. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Heywood, John. 1546. Proverbs in the English Tongue. London: Thomas Berthelet.
  • Hingston, Kylee-Anne. 2019. Articulating Bodies: The Narrative Form of Disability and Illness in Victorian Fiction. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
  • Hockett, Charles F. 1956. “Idiom Formation.” In For Roman Jakobson, edited by Morris Halle, 222–29. London: Mouton.
  • Holmes, Martha Stoddard. 2004. Fictions of Affliction: Disability in Victorian Culture. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Holquist, Michael. 2002. “Why We Should Remember Philology.” Profession 25 (1): 72–79.
  • Hori, M. 2004. Investigating Dickens’ Style: A Collocational Analysis. London: Palgrave.
  • Horne, Philip. 2013. “Style and the Making of Character in Dickens.” In Dickens’s Style, edited by Daniel Tyler, 155–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Horne, Richard. 1852. “Strings of Proverbs.” Household Words 4 (101): 538–40.
  • Horsman, Alan. 1974. Introduction to Dombey and Son by Charles Dickens, xiii–xlvi. Edited by Alan Horsman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Houghton, Walter. (1857) 1963. The Victorian Frame of Mind, 1830–1870. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • House, Humphry. 1941. The Dickens World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • House, Madeline, Graham Storey, Kathleen Tillotson, and Margaret Brown, eds. 1965–2002. The Letters of Charles Dickens. 12 vols. Oxford: Clarendon.
  • Houston, Gail Turley. 1994. Consuming Fictions: Gender, Class, and Hunger in Dickens’s Novels. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Hudson, Derek. 1972. Munby, Man of Two Worlds: The Life and Diaries of Arthur J. Munby 1828–1910. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hughes, Kathryn. 2018. Victorians Undone: Tales of the Flesh in the Age of Decorum. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Hui, Andrew. 2019. A Theory of the Aphorism: From Confucius to Twitter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Hullah, John. 1837. “A Visit to the Madrigal Society.” Bentley’s Miscellany 1:465–68.
  • Hunt, Leigh. 1842. “The Tories on Peace with China.” The Examiner, no. 1817:753.
  • Hunt, Leigh. 1846. “The Faintest Ministry.” The Examiner, no. 1995:257.
  • Husserl, Edmund. 1973. Experience and Judgement. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  • Husserl, Edmund. 1989. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy (Second Book). Philadelphia: Kluwer.
  • Igarashi, Yohei. 2015. “Statistical Analysis at the Birth of Close Reading.” New Literary History 46, no. 3 (Summer): 485–504.
  • Ingham, Patricia. 1992. Dickens, Women and Language. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Ingham, Patricia. 2008. “The Language of Dickens.” In A Companion to Charles Dickens, edited by David Paroissien, 126–41. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.
  • Jaffe, Audrey. 1987. “Omniscience in Our Mutual Friend: On Taking the Reader by Surprise.” Journal of Narrative Technique 17, no. 1 (Winter): 91–101.
  • Jaffe, Audrey. 1991. Vanishing Points: Dickens, Narrative and the Subject of Omniscience. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Jakobson, Roman. 1987. Language in Literature. Edited by Krystyna Pomorska and Stephen Rudy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • James, Henry. 1865. “Our Mutual Friend.” The Nation, December 21, 1865, 786–87.
  • James, Henry. (1877) 1999. The American. New York: Oxford World Classics.
  • James, Henry. (1881) 1999. The Portrait of a Lady. New York: Oxford World Classics.
  • James, Henry. (1884) 1999. “The Art of Fiction.” In Henry James: Major Stories and Essays, edited by Leon Edel et al., 572–93. New York: Library of America.
  • James, Henry. (1904) 1952. The Golden Bowl. New York: Grove Press.
  • James, Henry. (1913) 2011a. A Small Boy and Others: A Critical Edition. Edited by Peter Collister. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
  • James, Henry. (1914) 2011b. Notes of a Son and Brother. Edited by Peter Collister. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
  • James, Henry. (1921) 2011c. “Preface to The Tragic Muse.” In The Art of the Novel: Critical Prefaces. Edited by Colm Tóibín, 79–97. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • James, Stephen. 2012. “Repetition, Rumination, and Superstition: The Rituals of Our Mutual Friend.” English 61 (234): 214–33.
  • Jameson, Fredric. 1982. The Political Unconscious. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Janechek, Jennifer. 2015. “ ‘This Curious Association of Objects’: Dickens’s Treatment of Chair-Transported Characters in Dombey and Son and Bleak House.” Dickens Studies Annual 46:147–65.
  • Jerdan, William. 1857. “The Gift of Tongues.” Household Words 15 (355): 41–43.
  • John, Juliet. 2001. Dickens’s Villains: Melodrama, Character, Popular Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • John, Juliet. 2010. Dickens and Mass Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Johnson, Samuel. 1984a. “The Lives of the Poets: Abraham Cowley.” In Samuel Johnson: The Major Works, edited by Donald Greene, 677–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Johnson, Samuel. 1984b. Preface to A Dictionary of the English Language. In Samuel Johnson: The Major Works, edited by Donald Greene, 307–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Johnson, Samuel. 2018. Samuel Johnson. Edited by David Womersley, 411–14. The Rambler, no. 208 [1752]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Jordan, John O. 2010. Supposing Bleak House. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
  • Jordan, John O. 2011. “Response to Review by Deirdre David.” Review 19, September 29, 2011. www.review19.org.
  • Joshi, Priti. 2011. “Race.” In Charles Dickens in Context, edited by Sally Ledger and Holly Furneaux, 292–300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Joyce, Simon. 2002. “Inspector Bucket versus Tom-all-Alone’s, Literary Theory, and the Condition-of-England in the 1850s.” Dickens Studies Annual 32:129–49.
  • Kant, Immanuel. 1950. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Norman Kemp Smith. New York: Humanities Press.
  • Kaplan, Fred. 1975. Dickens and Mesmerism: The Hidden Springs of Fiction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Kaplan, Fred. 1981. Dickens’s Book of Memoranda. New York: New York Public Library Publications.
  • Keatley, Paula. 2017. “ ‘It’s about a Will’: Liberal Protestant Theology in Dickens’s Bleak House.” Nineteenth-Century Contexts 39 (2): 77–86.
  • Kelty, Jean McClure. 1961. “The Modern Tone of Charles Dickens.” The Dickensian 57 (335): 160–65.
  • Kennedy, G. W. 1973. “Naming and Language in Our Mutual Friend.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 28 (2): 165–78.
  • Kenner, Hugh. 1978. Joyce’s Voices. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
  • Keyes, Ralph. 2021. The Hidden History of Coined Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kiely, Robert. 1983. “Plotting and Scheming: The Design of Design in Our Mutual Friend.” Dickens Studies Annual 12:267–83.
  • Kincaid, James. 1971. Dickens and the Rhetoric of Laughter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kincaid, James, ed. 2018. The Daily Charles Dickens: A Year of Quotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kittay, Eva Feder. 1987. Metaphor: Its Cognitive Force and Linguistic Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kitton, F. G. 1890. Charles Dickens by Pen and Pencil. 2 Vols. London: Sabin and Dexter.
  • Kitton, F. G. 1899. Dickens and His Illustrators. London: George Redway.
  • Knoepflmacher, U. C. 1971. Laughter and Despair: Readings in Ten Novels of the Victorian Era. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Knoepflmacher, U. C. 1988. “From Outrage to Rage: Dickens’s Bruised Femininity.” In Dickens and Other Victorians, edited by Joanne Shattock, 75–96. London: Macmillan.
  • Kopec, Andrew. 2016. “The Digital Humanities, Inc.: Literary Criticism and the Fate of a Profession.” PMLA 131, no. 2 (March): 324–39.
  • Korte, Barbara. 1997. Body Language in Literature. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Kreilkamp, Ivan. 2007. “Dying like a Dog in Great Expectations.” In Victorian Animal Dreams, edited by Martin Danahay and Deborah Morse, 81–94. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Kreilkamp, Ivan. 2009. Voice and the Victorian Storyteller. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kucich, John. 1981. Excess and Restraint in the Novels of Charles Dickens. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
  • Kucich, John. 1985. “Dickens’s Fantastic Rhetoric: The Semantics of Reality and Unreality in Our Mutual Friend.” Dickens Studies Annual 14:167–89.
  • Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.
  • Lambert, Mark. 1981. Dickens and the Suspended Quotation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Larson, Janet. 1985. Dickens and the Broken Scripture. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
  • Law, Jules. 2010. The Social Life of Fluids: Blood, Milk, and Water in the Victorian Novel. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Leavis, F. R., and Q. D. Leavis. 1970. Dickens the Novelist. London: Chatto & Windus.
  • Ledbetter, Kathryn. 2012. Victorian Needlework. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
  • Ledger, Sally. 2007. Dickens and the Radical Popular Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ledger, Sally. 2011. “Dickens, Natural History, and Our Mutual Friend.” Partial Answers 9 (2): 363–78.
  • Ledger, Sally, and Holly Furneaux, eds. 2011. Charles Dickens in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Lefebvre, Henri. 1984. Everyday Life in the Modern World. Translated by Sacha Rabinovitch. New York: Transaction.
  • Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. Critique of Everyday Life. Translated by John Moore. New York: Verso.
  • Lesjak, Carolyn. 2006. Working Fictions. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Levine, George. 1986. “Dickens and Darwin, Science and Narrative Form.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language 28 (3): 250–81.
  • Levine, George. 1988. Darwin and the Novelists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Levine, George. 2021. “The Intentional Fallacy.” The Geezer Gazette. [Email March 9, 2021]
  • Lewes, George Henry. 1872a. “Dickens and the Art of the Novel.” Fortnightly Review 17:143–51.
  • Lewes, George Henry. 1872b. “Dickens in Relation to Criticism.” Fortnightly Review 11, no. 62 (February): 141–54.
  • Lewis, R. W. B. 1991. The Jameses: A Family Narrative. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Lightman, Bernard. 1997. “ ‘The Voices of Nature’: Popularizing Victorian Science.” In Victorian Science in Context, edited by Bernard Lightman, 187–211. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Litvack, Leon. 2008. “Our Mutual Friend.” In A Companion to Charles Dickens, edited by David Paroissien, 433–43. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008.
  • Long, Hoyt, and Richard Jean So. 2016. “Literary Pattern Recognition: Modernism between Close Reading and Machine Learning.” Critical Inquiry 42, no. 1 (Winter): 235–67.
  • Lougy, Robert. 2018. “Entangled Paths and Ghostly Resonances: Bleak House and Oedipus Rex.” Dickens Studies Annual 49 (1): 378–401.
  • Louttit, Chris. 2009. Dickens’s Secular Gospel. New York: Routledge.
  • Love, Brigid. 2008. “Dombey and Son.” In A Companion to Charles Dickens, edited by David Paroissien, 358–68. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.
  • MacKay, Carol Hanbery, ed. 1981. Dramatic Dickens. New York: St. Martin’s.
  • Macleod, Norman. 2002. “Which Hand? Reading Great Expectations as a Guessing Game.” Dickens Studies Annual 31:127–57.
  • Mahlberg, Michaela. 2013. Corpus Stylistics and Dickens’s Fiction. New York: Routledge.
  • Mahlberg, M., Stockwell, P., Wiegand, V., and Lentin, J. 2020. CLiC 2.1. Corpus Linguistics in Context. clic.bham.ac.uk.
  • Marcus, Stephen. 1965. Dickens: from Pickwick to Dombey. New York: Basic Books.
  • Marcus, Stephen. 1972. “Language into Structure: Pickwick Revisited.” Daedalus 101, no. 1 (Winter): 183–202.
  • Marryat, Florence. 1869. Véronique. London: Richard Bentley.
  • Marryat, Frederick. 1834. Peter Simple. London: Saunders and Otley.
  • Marryat, Frederick. 1836. Rattlin the Reefer. London: Richard Bentley.
  • Marryat, Frederick. 1841. Joseph Rushbrook. Philadelphia: Carey and Hart.
  • Marryat, Frederick. 1842. Percival Keene. London: Henry Colburn.
  • Marx, Karl. 1990. Capital. Vol. 1. Edited by Ernest Mandel. Translated by Ben Fowkes. New York: Penguin.
  • Masson, David. 1859. British Novelists and Their Styles. London: Macmillan.
  • Mayhew, Henry. 1968. London Labour and the London Poor. Vols. 1–4. New York: Dover.
  • McCarthy, Justin. (1864) 1965. “Modern Novelists: Charles Dickens.” Westminster Review 26:415–41.
  • McClintock, Anne. 1995. Imperial Leather. New York: Routledge.
  • McMaster, Juliet. 1987. Dickens the Designer. London: Macmillan.
  • Melisi, Laurent. 2003. James Joyce and the Difference of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1962. The Phenomenology of Perception. New York: Routledge.
  • Michie, Helena. 1987. The Flesh Made Word: Female Figures and Women’s Bodies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Michie, Helena. 2018. “Extra Man: Dining Out beyond the Marriage Plot in Our Mutual Friend.” In Replotting Marriage in Nineteenth-Century British Literature, edited by Jill Galvan and Elsie Michie, 211–28. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
  • Miller, Andrew. 2008. The Burdens of Perfection. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Miller, Andrew. 2012. “ ‘A Case of Metaphysics’: Counterfactuals, Realism, Great Expectations.” ELH 79 (3): 773–96.
  • Miller, D. A. 1988. The Novel and the Police. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Miller, D. A. 2003. Jane Austen, or The Secret of Style. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Miller, J. Hillis. 1958. Charles Dickens: The World of His Novels. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Miller, J. Hillis. 1971. Introduction to Bleak House by Charles Dickens, 11–34. Edited by Norman Page and J. Hillis Miller. New York: Penguin.
  • Miller, J. Hillis. 1982. Fiction and Repetition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Miller, J. Hillis. 1991a. Theory Then and Now. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Miller, J. Hillis. 1991b. Victorian Subjects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • “The Missing Link.” 1862. Punch 43:165.
  • Mitchell, Charlotte. 1996. Ed and Notes to Great Expectations. New York: Penguin.
  • Mitchell, David T. 2002. “Narrative Prosthesis and the Materiality of Metaphor.” In Disability Studies: Enabling the Humanities, edited by Sharon L. Snyder, Brenda Jo Brueggemann, and Rosemarie Garland-Thomson, 15–30. New York: Modern Language Association.
  • Mitchell, David T., and Sharon L. Snyder. 2000. Narrative Prosthesis: Disability and Dependencies of Discourse. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Mitchell, Sally. 1981. The Fallen Angel. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University Press.
  • Moore, Grace. 2004. Dickens and Empire: Discourses of Class, Race and Colonialism in the Works of Charles Dickens. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Moore, Jack. 1965. “Hearts and Hands in Great Expectations.” Dickensian 61:52–56.
  • Moran, Patricia. 1996. Word of Mouth: Body Language in Katherine Mansfield and Virginia Woolf. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
  • Morgentaler, Goldie. 1998. “Mediating on the Low: A Darwinian Reading of Great Expectations.” SEL 38 (4): 707–21.
  • Moretti, Franco. 2005. Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History. New York: Verso.
  • Moretti, Franco. 2013. Distant Reading. New York: Verso.
  • Morley, Henry, and William Lowes Rushton. 1858. “Saxon-English.” Household Words 18 (433): 89–92.
  • Morris, Pam. 1991. Dickens’s Class Consciousness. New York: St. Martin’s.
  • Mufti, Nasser. 2016. “Walking in Bleak House.” Novel 49 (1): 65–81.
  • Mugglestone, Lynda. 2005. Lost for Words: The Hidden History of the Oxford English Dictionary. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Mugglestone, Lynda. 2011. “ ‘Life-Writing’: The Lexicographer as Biographer in the Oxford English Dictionary.” In New Approaches to Historical Lexis, edited by R. W. McConchie et al., 14–26. Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
  • Müller, Friedrich Max. 1899. Lectures on the Science of Language. London: Longmans, Green.
  • Müller, Max. 1861. Lectures on the Science of Language. 2 Vols. London: Scribner.
  • Murray, K. M. Elisabeth. 1977. Caught in the Web of Words: James A. H. Murray and the Oxford English Dictionary. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Nash, John, ed. 2013. James Joyce in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • “Natural Selection.” 1860. All the Year Round. (July 7) 3:293–99.
  • Nayder, Lillian. 2012a. Introduction to Dickens, Sexuality and Gender, edited by Lillian Nayder, xxi–xxviii. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Nayder, Lillian. 2012b. The Other Dickens: A Life of Catherine Hogarth. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Newsom, Robert. 1977. Dickens on the Romantic Side of Familiar Things. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Newsom, Robert. 1989. “Embodying Dombey: Whole and in Part.” Dickens Studies Annual 18:197–219.
  • Nineteenth-Century Fiction. 2000. Chadwyck-Healey Literature Collections. ProQuest.
  • “O’Connell.” 1847. The Examiner, no. 2052:337.
  • OED Online. 2000–. Edited by John Simpson et al. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://oed.com.
  • O’Farrell, Mary Ann. 1997. Telling Complexions. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Oliphant, Margaret. 1897. William Blackwood and His Sons. Edinburgh: Blackwood.
  • “Oliver Twist.” 1839. Quarterly Review 64:83–102.
  • Orwell, George. 1965. The Decline of the English Murder. New York: Penguin.
  • O’Sullivan, Michael. 2008. The Incarnation of Language: Joyce, Proust and a Philosophy of the Flesh. New York: Continuum.
  • “Our Nearest Relation.” 1859. All the Year Round 1 (5): 112–15.
  • Pacious, Kathleen. 2016. “Misdirections, Delayed Disclosures, and the Ethics of Telling in Charles Dickens’s Our Mutual Friend.” Narrative 24 (3): 330–50.
  • Parish, Charles. 1962. “A Boy Brought Up ‘By Hand.’ ” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 17 (3): 286–88.
  • Partlow, Robert B. Jr., ed. 1970. Dickens the Craftsman: Strategies of Presentation. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Pasanek, Bradley M. 2015. Metaphors of Mind: An Eighteenth-Century Dictionary. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Pasanek, Bradley M., and D. Sculley. 2008. “Meaning and Mining: The Impact of Implicit Assumptions in Data Mining for the Humanities.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 43 (4): 409–24.
  • Patten, Robert L. 1978. Charles Dickens and His Publishers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Patten, Robert L. 2002. “Serial Illustration and Storytelling in David Copperfield.” In The Victorian Illustrated Book, edited by Richard Maxwell, 91–128. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
  • Patten, Robert L. 2012a. Charles Dickens and “Boz”: The Birth of the Industrial-Age Author. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Patten, Robert L. 2012b. Dickens and Victorian Print Cultures. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Patten, Robert L., John O. Jordan, and Catherine Waters, eds. 2018. Oxford Handbook of Charles Dickens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Peters, Laura. 2013. Dickens and Race. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
  • Perloff, Marjorie. 2004. Differentials: Poetry, Poetics, Pedagogy. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
  • Pettitt, Clare. 2004. Patent Inventions: Intellectual Property and the Victorian Novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Philip, Alex. 1906. “Blunders of Dickens and His Illustrators.” Dickensian 2 (11): 294–96.
  • Philpotts, Trey. 2014. The Companion to Dombey and Son. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
  • Piper, Andrew. 2018. Enumerations: Data and Literary Study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Piper, Andrew. 2020. Can We Be Wrong? The Problem of Textual Evidence in a Time of Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • “Plain English.” 1868. All the Year Round 20 (485): 205–8.
  • Poe, Edgar Allan. (1841) 1985. “The Murders in the Rue Morgue.” In The Works of Edgar Allan Poe. New York: Random House.
  • Pollock, G. 1993–94. “The Dangers of Proximity: The Spaces of Sexuality and Surveillance in Word and Image.” Discourse 16 (1): 3–50.
  • Poole, Adrian. 1997. Introduction to Our Mutual Friend by Charles Dickens, ix–xxiv. Edited by Adrian Poole. New York: Penguin.
  • Poovey, Mary. 1988. Uneven Developments. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Poovey, Mary. 1993. “Reading History in Literature: Speculation and Virtue in Our Mutual Friend.” In Historical Criticism and the Challenge of Theory, edited by Janet Levarie Smarr, 42–80. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
  • Poovey, Mary. 1995. Making a Social Body. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • “The Posthumous Papers of the Pickwick Club.” 1837. Quarterly Review 59:484–518.
  • Poulet, Georges. 1969. “Phenomenology of Reading.” New Literary History 1, no.1 (October): 53–68.
  • Price, Janet, and Margrit Shildrick. 2002. “Bodies Together: Touch, Ethics and Disability.” In Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory, edited by Marian Corker and Tom Shakespeare, 62–75. New York: Continuum.
  • Purton, Valerie. 2000. “Work.” In The Oxford Reader’s Companion to Dickens, edited by Paul Schlicke, 593–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Pykett, Lyn. 2002. Charles Dickens. London: Palgrave.
  • Qualls, Barry. 1992. The Secular Pilgrims of Victorian Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rancière, Jacques. 2004. The Flesh of Words. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Reay, Barry. 2002. Watching Hannah: Sexuality, Horror and Bodily Deformation in Victorian England. New York: Reaktion.
  • Reé, Jonathan. 2019. Witcraft: The Invention of Philosophy in English. New York: Penguin.
  • Reed, John R. 2011. Dickens’s Hyperrealism. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
  • Richards, Thomas. 1990. The Commodity Culture of Victorian England. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Risam, Roopika, and Alex Gil. 2022. “Introduction: The Questions of Minimal Computing.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 16 (2): 1–10.
  • Robbins, Bruce. 1990. “Telescopic Philanthropy: Professionalism and Responsibility in Bleak House.” In Nation and Narration, edited by Homi Bhabha, 213–30. New York: Routledge.
  • Robson, Catherine. 2006. “Historicizing Dickens.” In Palgrave Advances in Charles Dickens Studies, edited by John Bowen and Robert Patten, 234–54. London: Palgrave.
  • Rockwell, Geoffrey, and Stefan Sinclair. 2016. Hermeneutica: Computer-Assisted Interpretation in the Humanities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Rodas, Julia Miele. 2004. “Tiny Tim, Blind Bertha, and the Resistance of Miss Mowcher: Charles Dickens and the Uses of Disability.” Dickens Studies Annual 34:51–97.
  • Rodas, Julia Miele. 2006. “Mainstreaming Disability Studies.” Victorian Literature and Culture 34 (1): 371–84.
  • Romaine, Suzanne, ed. 1992. The Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. 4, 1776–1997. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Romano, John. 1978. Dickens and Reality. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Rosenberg, Edgar. 1972. “The Pale Usher Dusts His Lexicons.” Dickens Studies Annual 2:294–335, 374–78.
  • Rosenberg, Edgar. 1999. “A Note on Dickens’s Working Plans.” In Great Expectations by Charles Dickens, 469–88. Edited by Edgar Rosenberg. New York: Norton.
  • Rosenberg, Edgar. 2019. “How to Read Dickens in English: A Last Retrospect.” In Charles Dickens as an Agent of Change, edited by Joachim Frenk and Lena Steveker. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Ruskin, John. 1852. Modern Painters. London: Smith, Elder.
  • Ruskin, John. 1903. The Collected Works of John Ruskin. Edited by E. T. Cook and Alexander Wedderburn. London: George Allen.
  • Sadrin, Anny, ed. 1999. Dickens, Europe and the New Worlds. London: Macmillan.
  • Said, Edward. 2004. Humanism and Democratic Criticism. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Sala, George Augustus. 1853a. “Legal Houses of Call.” Household Words 7 (164): 253–57.
  • Sala, George Augustus. 1853b. “Slang.” Household Words 7 (183): 73–78.
  • Sanders, Andrew. 1982. Charles Dickens: Resurrectionist. London: Macmillan.
  • Sanders, Andrew. 1999. Dickens and the Spirit of the Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • The Saturday Review, November 11, 1865.
  • Scarry, Elaine. 1994. Resisting Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Schad, John, ed. 1996. Dickens Refigured: Bodies, Desires, and Other Histories. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
  • Schaffer, Talia. 2016. Romance’s Rival: Familiar Marriage in Victorian Fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Schaffer, Talia. 2018. “Disabling Marriage: Communities of Care in Our Mutual Friend.” In Replotting Marriage in Nineteenth-Century British Literature, edited by Elsie Michie and Jill Galvan, 192–210. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
  • Schaffer, Talia. 2021. Communities of Care: The Social Ethics of Victorian Fiction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Schalk, Sami. 2016. “Reevaluating the Supercrip.” Journal of Literary and Cultural Disabilities Studies 10 (1): 71–86.
  • Schlicke, Paul, ed. 1999. The Oxford Reader’s Companion to Dickens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Schor, Hillary. 1999. Dickens and the Daughter of the House. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schor, Hillary. 2006. “Dickens and Plot.” In Palgrave Advances in Charles Dickens Studies, edited by John Bowen and Robert L. Patten, 90–110. London: Palgrave.
  • Searle, John R. 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Secord, James A. 2000. Victorian Sensation: The Extraordinary Publication, Reception, and Secret Authorship of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 1985. Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Shattock, Joanne, ed. 1988. Dickens and Other Victorians: Essays in Honor of Philip Collins. London: Macmillan.
  • Shoaf, R. A. 1985. “The Play of Puns in Late Middle English Poetry: Concerning Juxtology.” In On Puns: The Foundation of Letters, edited by Jonathan Culler, 44–61. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Shore, Daniel. 2018. Cyberformalism: Histories of Linguistic Forms in the Digital Archive. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Schröder, Leena. 2000. “Virginia Woolf and the Body: Corporeality, Metaphor, and the In-Between.” Virginia Woolf Bulletin 3 (1): 15–20.
  • Shusterman, Richard. 2012. Thinking through the Body: Essays in Somaesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Shuttleworth, Russell. 2004. “Disabled Masculinity: Expanding the Masculine Repertoire.” In Gendering Disability, edited by Bonnie G. Smith and Beth Hutchinson, 166–78. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Siebers, Tobin. 2008. Disability Theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Silverman, Kaja. 1992. Male Subjectivity at the Margins. New York: Routledge.
  • Smith, L. P. 1925. Words and Idioms: Studies in the English Language. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Smith, Olivia. 1986. The Politics of Language, 1791–1819. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Sobchak, Vivian. 2006. “A Leg to Stand On: Prosthetics, Metaphor, and Materiality.” In The Prosthetic Impulse: From a Posthuman Present to a Biocultural Future, edited by Marquad Smith and Joanne Morra, 17–41. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Solberg, Sarah. 1980. “Dickens and Illustration: A Matter of Perspective.” Journal of Narrative Technique 10 (1): 128–37.
  • “Species.” 1860. All the Year Round. (June 2) 3:174–78.
  • Spencer, Herbert. 1872. The Principles of Psychology. New York: Appleton.
  • Spitzer, Leo. 1948. Linguistics and Literary History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Spivak, Gayatri. 2003. Death of a Discipline. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Stanley, L. 1986. “Biography as Microscope or Kaleidoscope? The Case of Hannah Culliwick’s Relationship with Arthur Munby.” Studies in Sexual Politics 13/14 (1): 28–46.
  • Steig, Michael. 1978. Dickens and Phiz. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Stephen, Leslie, ed. 1988. Dictionary of National Biography. Vol. 15. London: Smith, Elder.
  • Stern, Alexander. 2019. The Fall of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Stewart, Garrett. 1974. Dickens and the Trials of Imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Stewart, Garrett. 1990. Reading Voices: Literature and the Phonotext. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Stewart, Garrett. 1996. Dear Reader: The Conscripted Audience in Nineteenth-Century Fiction. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Stewart, Garrett. 2001a. “Dickens and Language.” In Cambridge Companion to Charles Dickens, edited by John O. Jordan, 136–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Stewart, Garrett. 2001b. “Narrative Economies in The Tenant of Wildfell Hall.” In New Approaches to the Literary Art of Anne Brontë, edited by Julie Nash and Barbara A. Suess, 75–102. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Stewart, Garrett. 2010a. “The Ethical Tempo of Narrative Syntax: Sylleptic Recognitions in Our Mutual Friend.” Partial Answers 8 (1): 119–45.
  • Stewart, Garrett. 2010b. “Reading Feeling and the ‘Transferred Life’: The Mill on the Floss.” In The Feeling of Reading: Affective Experience and Victorian Literature, edited by Rachel Ablow, 179–206. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Stewart, Garrett. 2015. The Deed of Reading: Literature, Writing, Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Stewart, Garrett. 2018. The One, the Other, and Only Dickens. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Stewart, Garrett. 2022. “The Late Great Dickens: Style Distilled.” In On Style in Victorian Fiction, edited by Daniel Tyler, 227–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Stitt, Megan. 1998. Metaphors of Change in the Language of Nineteenth-Century Fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Stone, Harry. 1970. “The Genesis of a Novel: Great Expectations.” In Charles Dickens, 1812–1870: A Centennial Volume, edited by E. W. F. Tomlin, 110–31. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1969.
  • Stone, Harry. 1979. Dickens and the Invisible World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Stone, Harry. 1985. “What’s in a Name: Fantasy and Calculation in Dickens.” Dickens Studies Annual 14:191–204.
  • Stone, Harry. 1987. Dickens’ Working Notes for His Novels. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Stone, Harry. 1994. The Night Side of Dickens: Cannibalism, Passion, Necessity. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
  • Stonehouse, J. H., ed. 1935. Catalogue of the Library of Charles Dickens from Gadshill. London: Piccadilly Fountain Press.
  • Storey, Gladys. 1939. Dickens and Daughter. London: Frederick Muller.
  • Sucksmith, H. P. 1970. The Narrative Art of Charles Dickens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Sussman, Herbert. 1995. Victorian Masculinities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sussman, Herbert, and Gerhard Joseph. 2004. “Prefiguring the Posthuman: Dickens and Prosthesis.” Victorian Literature and Culture 32 (2): 617–28.
  • Tambling, Jeremy. 1996. “Preface to the Charles Dickens Edition (1867).” In David Copperfield by Charles Dickens, xi-xli. Edited by Jeremy Tambling. New York: Penguin.
  • Taylor, Dennis. 1993. Hardy’s Literary Language and Victorian Philology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Tenniel, John. 1863. “The Haunted Lady, or ‘The Ghost’ in the Looking-Glass.” Punch, July 4, 1863.
  • Thackeray, William Makepeace. 1963. Vanity Fair. Edited by Geoffrey Tillotson and Kathleen Tillotson. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Thomas, William Moy. 1853. “Market Gardens.” Household Words 7 (171): 409–14.
  • Thomson, David Croal. 1884. The Life and Labours of Hablot Knight Brown, “Phiz.” London: Chapman & Hall.
  • Tillotson, Kathleen. 1956. Novels of the Eighteen-Forties. Oxford: Clarendon.
  • Times Digital Archive, 1785–1985. Gale.
  • Tomalin, Claire. 2011. Charles Dickens: A Life. New York: Penguin.
  • Tomalin, Marcus. 2007. “ ‘Vulgarisms and Broken English’: The Familiar Perspicuity of William Hazlitt.” Romanticism 13 (1): 28–52.
  • Tooke, John Horne. 1860. Diversions of Purley. London: William Tegg.
  • “Transmutation of Species.” 1861. All the Year Round. (March 9) 4:519–21.
  • Trench, Richard Chenevix. 1852. On the Study of Words. London: Macmillan.
  • Tromp, Marlene. 2000. The Private Rod. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
  • Turner, James. 2014. Philology: The Forgotten Origins of the Modern Humanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Tyler, Daniel. 2011. “Feeling for the Future: The Crisis of Anticipation in Great Expectations.” 19: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century 14. https://doi.org/10.16995/ntn.607.
  • Tyler, Daniel, ed. 2013. Dickens’s Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Underwood, Michael. 1784. A Treatise on the Diseases of Children, with Directions for the Management of Infants from the Birth; Especially Such as Are Brought Up by Hand. London: J. Matthews.
  • Underwood, Ted. 2019. Distant Horizons: Digital Evidence and Literary Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Vlock, Deborah. 1998. Dickens, Novel Reading, and the Victorian Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Walder, Dennis. 1981. Dickens and Religion. London: Allen & Unwin.
  • Walder, Dennis. 1995. Introduction to Sketches by Boz by Charles Dickens, ix–xxxiv. New York: Penguin.
  • Wales, Katie. 1992. The Language of James Joyce. New York: St. Martin’s.
  • Waters, Catherine. 1997. Dickens and the Politics of Family. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Welsh, Alexander. 1971. The City of Dickens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Welsh, Alexander. 2000. The Art of Bleak House and Hard Times. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • “Western Himalaya and Tibet Review.” 1852. The Examiner, no. 2326:548–49.
  • Wheeler, Michael. 1990. Death and the Future Life in Victorian Literature and Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wider, Kathleen. 1997. The Bodily Nature of Consciousness. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Williams, Raymond. 1964. “Social Criticism in Dickens.” Critical Quarterly 6 (4): 214–27.
  • Williams, Raymond. 1970. “Dickens and Social Ideas.” Dickens 1970, edited by Michael Slater, 77–98. London: Stein and Day.
  • Williams, Raymond. 1975. The Country and the City. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Williams, Raymond. 1979. Politics and Letters. New York: New Left Books.
  • Wills, David. 1995. Prosthesis. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Wilson, Angus. 1961. “Charles Dickens: A Haunting.” In The Dickens Critics, edited by George H. Ford and Lauriat Lane, 374–85. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1997. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.
  • Woloch, Alex. 2003. The One vs. the Many: Minor Characters and the Space of the Protagonist in the Novel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Wood, Claire. 2015. Dickens and the Business of Death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Woolf, Virginia. (1919) 1984. “Modern Fiction.” In The Virginia Woolf Reader, edited by Michael A. Leaska, 283–91. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
  • Woolf, Virginia. (1919) 1925. “George Eliot.” In The Common Reader, 229–42. New York: Harcourt Brace.
  • Woolf, Virginia. (1919) 1998. “Dickens by a Disciple.” In The Essays of Virginia Woolf, edited by Andrew McNellie, 3:25–28. London: Hogarth.
  • Woolf, Virginia. (1925) 1966. “David Copperfield.” In Collected Essays of Virginia Woolf, edited by Leonard Woolf, 1:191–95. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
  • Woolf, Virginia. (1930) 1967. “Street Haunting.” In Collected Essays of Virginia Woolf, edited by Leonard Woolf, 4:155–56. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
  • Woolf, Virginia. 1985. [February 25, 1936 entry]. In The Diary of Virginia Woolf, edited by Anne Olivier Bell, 5:12–13. London: Harvest Press.
  • Woolf, Virginia. 1998. “Charlotte Brontë.” In The Essays of Virginia Woolf, edited by Andrew McNellie, 2:26–31. London: Hogarth.
  • Wordsworth, William. (1802) 1991. Preface to Lyrical Ballads by William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge, 241–72. Edited by R. L. Brett and A. R. Jones. New York: Routledge.
  • “Writings of Charles Dickens.” 1845. North British Review 3 (May): 65–87.
  • Yaeger, Patricia. 2007. “Editor’s Column: The Polyphony Issue.” PMLA 122 (2): 433–48.
  • Zemka, Sue. 2015. “1822, 1845, 1869, and 1917: Artificial Hands.” BRANCH: Britain, Representation and Nineteenth-Century History, edited by Dino Felluga. Extension of Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net.
  • Zirker, Angelika. 2011. “Physiognomy and the Reading of Character in Our Mutual Friend.” Partial Answers 9 (2): 379–90.

Annotate

Next Chapter
Index
PreviousNext
All rights reserved
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org